In an logical Space S(A) based on the Axiom Set A if we find a statement x s.t. x = ¬ x
or x ⇔ ¬ x then x is called a paradox.
There are so many paradoxes :-
1. Self-Reference : x = ¬ x s.t "This statement is false." :)
2. Vicious circularity, or infinite regress :
"What happens when Pinocchio says, 'My nose will grow now'?" [from Wikipedia ]
3. Russell paradox: S = {x| x ∉ S} is there any element in S .
4. Proof that Almighty doesn't exist : Let A =Almighty exist and it has all power .
So it must have power P defined as who have P he will be
destroyed .
Thus A is a paradox.
Principal Of Exclusion : We should define Our Logical Space / Language s.t. Paradox does not exist. So if you have a Language where some statement can be a Paradox then exclude such statements from definition and you have to reduce your Language space such that no other statement can conclude by logical consequence in a paradox .
A language with a paradox is not a logical language and it is something which can't lead us to truth . So we must see some logical language .
Now one question is there can we describe "Paradox" in a logical language . :)
Can we describe the illogical language in such logical language say L .
If we bind our self by logic can we tell that there is a out of logic universe or universe of error .
or x ⇔ ¬ x then x is called a paradox.
There are so many paradoxes :-
1. Self-Reference : x = ¬ x s.t "This statement is false." :)
2. Vicious circularity, or infinite regress :
"What happens when Pinocchio says, 'My nose will grow now'?" [from Wikipedia ]
3. Russell paradox: S = {x| x ∉ S} is there any element in S .
4. Proof that Almighty doesn't exist : Let A =Almighty exist and it has all power .
So it must have power P defined as who have P he will be
destroyed .
Thus A is a paradox.
Principal Of Exclusion : We should define Our Logical Space / Language s.t. Paradox does not exist. So if you have a Language where some statement can be a Paradox then exclude such statements from definition and you have to reduce your Language space such that no other statement can conclude by logical consequence in a paradox .
A language with a paradox is not a logical language and it is something which can't lead us to truth . So we must see some logical language .
Now one question is there can we describe "Paradox" in a logical language . :)
Can we describe the illogical language in such logical language say L .
If we bind our self by logic can we tell that there is a out of logic universe or universe of error .